If a state passed a law prohibiting the use of contraceptives,would a court likely find this law to be unconstitutional?
A)Yes,because it is an unreasonable seizure of property.
B)Yes,because it violates individuals' right to privacy.
C)No,as long as the law treats citizens from other states the same as citizens in that state.
D)Yes,unless the law can pass the rational-basis test.
E)No,as long as the law does not discriminate against women.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

A)In the 1965 case Griswold v.Connecticut,the Supreme Court ruled that a
Connecticut law prohibiting the use of contraceptives was unconstitutional because it violated individuals' right to privacy.
B)In the 1965 case Griswold v.Connecticut,the Supreme Court ruled that a Connecticut law prohibiting the use of contraceptives was unconstitutional because it violated individuals' right to privacy.
C)In the 1965 case Griswold v.Connecticut,the Supreme Court ruled that a Connecticut law prohibiting the use of contraceptives was unconstitutional because it violated individuals' right to privacy.
D)In the 1965 case Griswold v.Connecticut,the Supreme Court ruled that a Connecticut law prohibiting the use of contraceptives was unconstitutional because it violated individuals' right to privacy.
E)In the 1965 case Griswold v.Connecticut,the Supreme Court ruled that a Connecticut law prohibiting the use of contraceptives was unconstitutional because it violated individuals' right to privacy.

If a State Passed a Law Prohibiting the Use of Contraceptives,would