Which of the following holds that a person may be deemed not guilty by reason of insanity,even if he or she knew that a criminal act was wrong,as long as the defendant was driven to commit the crime from some urge resulting from a mental deficiency the defendant could not resist?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

A)The irresistible-impulse test allows a verdict of not guilty by reason of insanity
even if the accused knew a criminal act was wrong,as long as some "irresistible impulse" resulting from a mental deficiency drove the person to commit the crime.
B)The irresistible-impulse test allows a verdict of not guilty by reason of insanity even if the accused knew a criminal act was wrong,as long as some "irresistible impulse" resulting from a mental deficiency drove the person to commit the crime.
C)The irresistible-impulse test allows a verdict of not guilty by reason of insanity even if the accused knew a criminal act was wrong,as long as some "irresistible impulse" resulting from a mental deficiency drove the person to commit the crime.
D)The irresistible-impulse test allows a verdict of not guilty by reason of insanity even if the accused knew a criminal act was wrong,as long as some "irresistible impulse" resulting from a mental deficiency drove the person to commit the crime.
E)The irresistible-impulse test allows a verdict of not guilty by reason of insanity even if the accused knew a criminal act was wrong,as long as some "irresistible impulse" resulting from a mental deficiency drove the person to commit the crime.

Which of the Following Holds That a Person May Be