Louisa decides to go on a zip line adventure.She signs a contract before she begins to go on the zip line,which says that she assumes the risks of accident or injury.While walking up the steps to grab the zip line,Louisa falls down due to a broken hand rail on the stairs.Could the property owner be held responsible?
A)Yes because she had not yet started zip lining but after she actually grabbed the line,the company would no longer be held responsible.
B)Yes,because a fall due to a faulty handrail was not the type of risk Louisa thought she was assuming.
C)No because of Louisa's implied assumption of the risk.
D)No because Louisa fell on her own.
E)No because of Louisa's express assumption of the risk.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

A)A 1998 case against the Family Fitness Center indicated a plaintiff who signed an express waiver of liability could sue because the type of injury the plaintiff suffered was not the type of risk he had assumed
B)A 1998 case against the Family Fitness Center indicated a plaintiff who signed an express waiver of liability could sue because the type of injury the plaintiff suffered was not the type of risk he had assumed
C)A 1998 case against the Family Fitness Center indicated a plaintiff who signed an express waiver of liability could sue because the type of injury the plaintiff suffered was not the type of risk he had assumed
D)A 1998 case against the Family Fitness Center indicated a plaintiff who signed an express waiver of liability could sue because the type of injury the plaintiff suffered was not the type of risk he had assumed
E)A 1998 case against the Family Fitness Center indicated a plaintiff who signed an express waiver of liability could sue because the type of injury the plaintiff suffered was not the type of risk he had assumed

Louisa Decides to Go on a Zip Line Adventure