What was the result on appeal of the R.J.Reynolds Tobacco case in the text in which the trial court awarded a smoker approximately $200,000 against R.J.Reynolds Tobacco?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

A)The 10th Circuit affirmed a trial court decision in which a smoker was awarded approximately $200,000 from R.J.Reynolds Tobacco,which before 1969 had negligently failed to warn smokers of the harm associated with smoking cigarettes.No duty to warn exists for dangers arising either from unforeseeable misuses of a product or from obvious dangers.
B)The 10th Circuit affirmed a trial court decision in which a smoker was awarded approximately $200,000 from R.J.Reynolds Tobacco,which before 1969 had negligently failed to warn smokers of the harm associated with smoking cigarettes.No duty to warn exists for dangers arising either from unforeseeable misuses of a product or from obvious dangers.
C)The 10th Circuit affirmed a trial court decision in which a smoker was awarded approximately $200,000 from R.J.Reynolds Tobacco,which before 1969 had negligently failed to warn smokers of the harm associated with smoking cigarettes.No duty to warn exists for dangers arising either from unforeseeable misuses of a product or from obvious dangers.
D)The 10th Circuit affirmed a trial court decision in which a smoker was awarded approximately $200,000 from R.J.Reynolds Tobacco,which before 1969 had negligently failed to warn smokers of the harm associated with smoking cigarettes.No duty to warn exists for dangers arising either from unforeseeable misuses of a product or from obvious dangers.
E)The 10th Circuit affirmed a trial court decision in which a smoker was awarded approximately $200,000 from R.J.Reynolds Tobacco,which before 1969 had negligently failed to warn smokers of the harm associated with smoking cigarettes.No duty to warn exists for dangers arising either from unforeseeable misuses of a product or from obvious dangers.

What Was the Result on Appeal of the R