What was the result in the text's case involving a plaintiff who suffered permanent liver damages as a result of drinking a glass of wine with a Tylenol capsule?
A)For plaintiff,because no comparative negligence was found.
B)For defendant,because the plaintiff's adverse reaction from the ingestion of only one capsule was extremely rare.
C)For defendant,because it had no duty to warn.
D)For plaintiff,because the degree of potential harm was substantial and it would have been easy to place a warning.
E)For defendant,because there was no proof of market share.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

A)Through the balancing test,the court found that the degree of potential harm was
substantial and that it would have been relatively easy to place a warning on the product label.
B)Through the balancing test,the court found that the degree of potential harm was substantial and that it would have been relatively easy to place a warning on the product label.
C)Through the balancing test,the court found that the degree of potential harm was substantial and that it would have been relatively easy to place a warning on the product label.
D)Through the balancing test,the court found that the degree of potential harm was substantial and that it would have been relatively easy to place a warning on the product label.
E)Through the balancing test,the court found that the degree of potential harm was substantial and that it would have been relatively easy to place a warning on the product label.

What Was the Result in the Text's Case Involving a Plaintiff