The doctrine of teaches that an accident that is unlikely to occur unless the defendant was negligent is itself circumstantial evidence that the defendant was negligent.
A)Comparative negligence
B)Ipso Facto
C)Res ipsa loquitur.
D)Negligence per se.
E)Strict liability.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

A)The doctrine of res ipsa loquitur teaches that an accident that is unlikely to occur
unless the defendant was negligent is itself circumstantial evidence that the defendant was negligent.
B)The doctrine of res ipsa loquitur teaches that an accident that is unlikely to occur unless the defendant was negligent is itself circumstantial evidence that the defendant was negligent.
C)The doctrine of res ipsa loquitur teaches that an accident that is unlikely to occur unless the defendant was negligent is itself circumstantial evidence that the defendant was negligent.
D)The doctrine of res ipsa loquitur teaches that an accident that is unlikely to occur unless the defendant was negligent is itself circumstantial evidence that the defendant was negligent.
E)The doctrine of res ipsa loquitur teaches that an accident that is unlikely to occur unless the defendant was negligent is itself circumstantial evidence that the defendant was negligent.

The Doctrine of Teaches That an Accident That Is Unlikely