Which of the following was the result on appeal in Crown Awards,Inc. ,v.Discount Trophy & Communication,Inc. ,the case in the text involving whether the defendant violated the plaintiff's copyright on a type of trophy?
A) That the defendant was entitled to a judgment in its favor because the defendant's product was not identical to the plaintiff's product.
B) That the trial court correctly found that proof of actual access to the infringed product was required,that actual access was established,and that the defendant's product was an exact copy of the plaintiff's product,thereby entitling the plaintiff to a judgment in its favor.
C) That the facts established a reasonable possibility that the manufacturer had access to the plaintiff's work and that considering the similarities between the works,the plaintiff was entitled to prevail.
D) That the trial court erred in refusing to require proof that the defendant had actual access to the trophy design at issue.
E) That the trial court correctly found that the defendant had access to the product but that copying was allowed because the plaintiff had not properly protected its work.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: An invention might be protected by trade
Q2: China's lax enforcement of intellectual property laws
Q2: Property that is primarily the result of
Q5: As long as copies are used only
Q5: Copyrights protect the expression of creative ideas.
Q7: What was the finding of the jury
Q10: A person who applies for a domain
Q13: Copyrights protect ideas themselves.
Q13: A trademark does not encompass ideas such
Q17: Evidence of actual confusion is a prerequisite
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents