What was the result in the Opening Case in which the plaintiff attempted to buy a jet from Pepsi for Pepsi points and some additional funds?
A) The plaintiff did not prevail because the jet was unobtainable as a military aircraft.
B) The plaintiff prevailed,and Pepsi had to sell the jet as offered because Pepsi failed to specifically reserve details of the offer to a separate writing.
C) The plaintiff prevailed,and Pepsi had to sell the jet as offered because Pepsi's advertisement was considered an offer which the plaintiff validly accepted.
D) The plaintiff did not prevail because Pepsi reserved the details of the offer to a separate writing,and Pepsi had the authority to reject the plaintiff's offer to purchase.
E) The plaintiff prevailed,and Pepsi had to provide the jet as offered because Pepsi did not revoke the offer soon enough.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: Under the Mailbox Rule,a valid contract is
Q2: Which of the following is true of
Q5: What standard do courts use to interpret
Q5: If the means by which an acceptance
Q7: An invitation to negotiate is an offer
Q8: What was the result in the case
Q9: Courts interpret contracts using an objective standard.
Q10: Only the offeree to whom an offer
Q14: The number of circumstances under which silence
Q20: In the absence of a time condition
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents