What was the result in the case discussed in the text Andrus v.State Department of Transportation,and City of Olympia in which the plaintiff sued because a job offer was allegedly revoked?
A) The plaintiff won because the city had validly offered him a job and had no right to revoke it.
B) The defendant won because the purported job offer contained insufficient information to be considered reasonably certain in regard to its terms.
C) The defendant won because it had truly received a bad reference.
D) The plaintiff won because,while there was no contract,the court ruled that the city was not allowed to mislead him on equitable grounds and also on grounds of unlawful discrimination.
E) The defendant won because the plaintiff had not specifically accepted the job.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q9: If an offer authorizes certain means of
Q19: It is always easy to know when
Q20: Death or incapacity of an offeror immediately
Q21: Why is an invitation to negotiate not
Q22: Which of the following is true of
Q24: If a person wishes to ensure that
Q25: Emily asks Sasha if Sasha would consider
Q26: An auction is presumed to be _,if
Q27: Joe's car is for sale and he
Q28: Bailey is selling his baseball cards.He writes
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents