Sonia goes to have her hair trimmed and agrees to pay $40 to the stylist.While there,Sonia decides that she would also like highlights.The stylist informs her that highlights will cost an additional $30.Sonia agrees to the price,gets the highlights,but refuses to pay the extra amount.What is the likely result in a dispute between Sonia and the stylist and why?
A) Sonia will win because the stylist had a preexisting duty to have Sonia's hair look as good as possible.
B) Sonia will win because there was no valid consideration in exchange for the highlighting.
C) The stylist will win because she did additional work in exchange for the extra payment;and,therefore,a valid unilateral contract existed.
D) The stylist will win because she did additional work in exchange for the extra payment;and,therefore,Sonia's promise was supported by valid consideration.
E) The stylist will win unless Sonia can show that she had previously received both a trim and highlights for $40.If she can prove that she previously received both for $40,then the past expectations rule applies.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q54: Which of the following is NOT an
Q55: What can a business do to protect
Q56: A promise to do something that you
Q57: In return for his oral promise to
Q58: Raphael,who owes $10,000 to his credit card
Q60: Bailey agrees to bathe and groom Keiko's
Q61: Assuming no exception applies,which of the following
Q62: Which of the following would be the
Q63: In a lawsuit between the bank and
Q64: In a lawsuit between the bank and
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents