In the Case Opener,Apple customers tried to disaffirm purchases of game currency by their children.What was the result?
A) The court dismissed the lawsuit on the basis that no contractual agreement was needed in order for the parents to be bound in regard to purchases of game currency so long as their passwords were used.
B) The court dismissed the lawsuit on the basis that the parents were bound by the Terms of Service and notifications of their original contracts with Apple binding them to future purchases of game currency regardless of whether passwords were used.
C) The court refused to dismiss the lawsuit because as a matter of law parents cannot be required to contractually agree to their children's future purchases that are unapproved by the parents.
D) The court dismissed the lawsuit on the basis that the parents were bound by the Terms of Service and notifications of their original contracts with Apple binding them to future purchases of game currency when their passwords were used.
E) The court refused to dismiss the lawsuit because no case law was provided to prove that Apple's Terms of Service served as a contract for all subsequent transactions.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: Parents are responsible for the torts committed
Q2: If a minor enters into contract with
Q2: As a general rule, parents are not
Q4: In pari delicto is the term for
Q5: Which of the following is an element
Q6: If a contract contains an illegal part,courts
Q7: In Great Britain,a young person may enter
Q8: In Buckeye Check Cashing,Inc. ,v.Cardegna et al,the
Q12: Someone who has been adjudicated insane has
Q16: Once a young person reaches the age
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents