Is Roland required to pay for the training program?
A) No,although the training program was legal,the contract contains an illegal subject and is void.
B) Although the contract was legal when formed,its subject later became illegal under a new statute,thus both parties are discharged from their obligations under the contract.
C) Although the contract was legal when formed,its subject later became illegal under a new statute,thus it is voidable by either party.
D) Yes,the training program was legal and the legal part of the contract can be severed from the illegal part.
E) Yes,only Parna has the right to void the contract.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q74: According to the majority rule,would Cassandra have
Q75: In Lopez v.Kmart Corporation,the case in the
Q76: Roland wants to avoid paying for the
Q77: [Motorcycle crash] Cassandra,who would be turning 18
Q78: Is Ines correct in claiming that no
Q80: [Poker dealer] Roland and Parna sign a
Q82: Explain Great Britain's approach to the age
Q82: [Pedicurist license] Briana applied for a job
Q83: Set forth in detail the test that
Q86: In regard to the rule used in
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents