Assuming covenants not to compete in employment contracts are legal in their state,would Lisette likely be able to enforce the contract against Calvin?
A)Yes,because Calvin is working for a competitor,his employment contract specifically states that it remains in effect if the business is sold to a new owner,and the covenant not to compete is reasonable.
B)Yes,because the covenant not to compete protects a legitimate business interest.
C)Yes,because Calvin is working for a competitor.
D)No,because the covenant not to compete does not contain a period of time and geographic area that are reasonable.
E)Yes,because Calvin is working for a competitor and his employment contract specifically states that it remains in effect if the business is sold to a new owner.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

A)Covenants not to compete in employment contracts are legal in most states,but they must protect a legitimate business interest.They must also apply to a period of time and geographic area that are reasonable for that purpose and not unlawfully impinge on the employee's rights.
B)Covenants not to compete in employment contracts are legal in most states,but they must protect a legitimate business interest.They must also apply to a period of time and geographic area that are reasonable for that purpose and not unlawfully impinge on the employee's rights.
C)Covenants not to compete in employment contracts are legal in most states,but they must protect a legitimate business interest.They must also apply to a period of time and geographic area that are reasonable for that purpose and not unlawfully impinge on the employee's rights.

Assuming Covenants Not to Compete in Employment Contracts Are Legal