Which of the following was the result on appeal in the Case Opener involving the claim that Michael Jordan owed $5 million based on his agreement to pay the plaintiff's mother on the premise that he was the father,although it was later determined that the child was not his?
A) That the agreement to pay $5 million could be rescinded based on a mutual mistake of fact.
B) That the agreement to pay $5 million could not be rescinded because Jordan waited too long in which to complain about the contract.
C) That the agreement to pay $5 million could be rescinded based on the mother's fraud.
D) That the agreement to pay $5 million could be rescinded based on either a mutual mistake of fact or based on the mother's fraud.
E) That the agreement to pay $5 million could not be rescinded because Jordan was aware of a question about his parentage.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q2: The active hiding of the truth about
Q10: Both European and U.S.courts will interfere with
Q11: Without legal assent a contract may be
Q13: Fraudulent misrepresentation and intentional misrepresentation are not
Q14: An erroneous belief about the facts of
Q15: The rules about legal assent were developed
Q16: Mistakes in contract law result from untrue
Q16: Zara and Wahid have a lot of
Q17: For fraudulent misrepresentation to be the basis
Q18: The statement of fact need not be
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents