When duress is at issue,the needed for legal consent has been removed by the specifics of the threat.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

A)The injured party makes the case for duress by demonstrating that the threat left
no reasonable alternatives and that the free will necessary for legal consent was removed by the specifics of the threat.
B)The injured party makes the case for duress by demonstrating that the threat left no reasonable alternatives and that the free will necessary for legal consent was removed by the specifics of the threat.
C)The injured party makes the case for duress by demonstrating that the threat left no reasonable alternatives and that the free will necessary for legal consent was removed by the specifics of the threat.
D)The injured party makes the case for duress by demonstrating that the threat left no reasonable alternatives and that the free will necessary for legal consent was removed by the specifics of the threat.
E)The injured party makes the case for duress by demonstrating that the threat left no reasonable alternatives and that the free will necessary for legal consent was removed by the specifics of the threat.

When Duress Is at Issue,the Needed for Legal Consent Has