In which circumstance may a court find parol evidence admissible to further the court's understanding of an agreement?
A)When a court determines that a written agreement does not represent a complete and final version of the agreement.
B)When a court determines that the plaintiff failed to do sufficient research to determine if signing the agreement was advisable.
C)When a court determines that there is significant disagreement regarding the complete and final version of the agreement.
D)When a court determines that there is disagreement between the parties' over performance of the agreement once performance has actually started.
E)When a court determines that either party failed to do sufficient research to determine if signing the agreement was advisable.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

A)When court determines that the written agreement does not represent a complete and final version of the agreement,evidence to further the court's understanding may be admissible.The additional evidence is limited to elements missing from the writing but consistent with it.
B)When court determines that the written agreement does not represent a complete and final version of the agreement,evidence to further the court's understanding may be admissible.The additional evidence is limited to elements missing from the writing but consistent with it.
C)When court determines that the written agreement does not represent a complete and final version of the agreement,evidence to further the court's understanding may be admissible.The additional evidence is limited to elements missing from the writing but consistent with it.
D)When court determines that the written agreement does not represent a complete and final version of the agreement,evidence to further the court's understanding may be admissible.The additional evidence is limited to elements missing from the writing but consistent with it.
E)When court determines that the written agreement does not represent a complete and final version of the agreement,evidence to further the court's understanding may be admissible.The additional evidence is limited to elements missing from the writing but consistent with it.

In Which Circumstance May a Court Find Parol Evidence Admissible