Ned and Trayvon enter into a contract for Ned to buy goods from Trayvon.The contract contains an antiassignment clause.Ned breaches the contract to pay for the goods after Trayvon delivers the items as required by contract.Trayvon does not want to sue for breach,so instead he assigns the right to pursue damages for breach of contract to Melissa.Is the assignment valid?
A)Yes,but only if the assignment complies with the statute of frauds.
B)No,because it would increase Ned's duties to have to pay Melissa.
C)No,because the antiassignment clause prohibits the assignment.
D)Yes,because antiassignment clauses are no longer valid if any part of the contract is not performed
E)Yes,because antiassignment clauses do not affect the right to receive damages for breach of contract to sell goods or services.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

A)Antiassignment clauses do not affect the right to receive damages for a breach of contract to sell goods or services.
B)Antiassignment clauses do not affect the right to receive damages for a breach of contract to sell goods or services.
C)Antiassignment clauses do not affect the right to receive damages for a breach of contract to sell goods or services.
D)Antiassignment clauses do not affect the right to receive damages for a breach of contract to sell goods or services.
E)Antiassignment clauses do not affect the right to receive damages for a breach of contract to sell goods or services.

Ned and Trayvon Enter into a Contract for Ned to Buy