Is Rita correct that there is no contract because there is nothing at all in writing?
A)Yes,although the UCC is lenient about the statute of frauds,there must at least be something in writing to evidence the existence of a contract.
B)Yes,because Rita made no payment.
C)Yes,unless the good were specifically manufactured for Rita.
D)No,but only if Rita has made a payment under the contract.
E)No,because there has been partial-performance of the contract.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

A)The UCC includes a partial-performance exception to the statute of frauds.An
oral sales or lease contract is enforceable to the extent that payment has been made and accepted or goods have been received and accepted.
B)The UCC includes a partial-performance exception to the statute of frauds.An oral sales or lease contract is enforceable to the extent that payment has been made and accepted or goods have been received and accepted.
C)The UCC includes a partial-performance exception to the statute of frauds.An oral sales or lease contract is enforceable to the extent that payment has been made and accepted or goods have been received and accepted.
D)The UCC includes a partial-performance exception to the statute of frauds.An oral sales or lease contract is enforceable to the extent that payment has been made and accepted or goods have been received and accepted.
E)The UCC includes a partial-performance exception to the statute of frauds.An oral sales or lease contract is enforceable to the extent that payment has been made and accepted or goods have been received and accepted.

Is Rita Correct That There Is No Contract Because There