Is Samantha likely correct in that she owes Maddie no obligation?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

A)According to the case in the text,U.S.A.Coil & Air Inc. ,v.Hodess Building Co. ,"When a buyer justifiably revokes acceptance of goods,the measure of direct damages is the difference between the cost of cover and the contract price,less any expenses saved as a result of the seller's breach.UCC 2-7111)b)." UCC Sections 2-608 and 2A-517 sometimes allow the buyer or lessee to revoke acceptance of nonconforming goods.For instance,Hodess rejected acceptance of nonconforming goods.Hodess was allowed to reject acceptance because it had made a reasonable assumption that the nonconformity would be cured but then the nonconformity was not cured within a reasonable amount of time.
B)According to the case in the text,U.S.A.Coil & Air Inc. ,v.Hodess Building Co. ,"When a buyer justifiably revokes acceptance of goods,the measure of direct damages is the difference between the cost of cover and the contract price,less any expenses saved as a result of the seller's breach.UCC 2-7111)b)." UCC Sections 2-608 and 2A-517 sometimes allow the buyer or lessee to revoke acceptance of nonconforming goods.For instance,Hodess rejected acceptance of nonconforming goods.Hodess was allowed to reject acceptance because it had made a reasonable assumption that the nonconformity would be cured but then the nonconformity was not cured within a reasonable amount of time.
C)According to the case in the text,U.S.A.Coil & Air Inc. ,v.Hodess Building Co. ,"When a buyer justifiably revokes acceptance of goods,the measure of direct damages is the difference between the cost of cover and the contract price,less any expenses saved as a result of the seller's breach.UCC 2-7111)b)." UCC Sections 2-608 and 2A-517 sometimes allow the buyer or lessee to revoke acceptance of nonconforming goods.For instance,Hodess rejected acceptance of nonconforming goods.Hodess was allowed to reject acceptance because it had made a reasonable assumption that the nonconformity would be cured but then the nonconformity was not cured within a reasonable amount of time.
D)According to the case in the text,U.S.A.Coil & Air Inc. ,v.Hodess Building Co. ,"When a buyer justifiably revokes acceptance of goods,the measure of direct damages is the difference between the cost of cover and the contract price,less any expenses saved as a result of the seller's breach.UCC 2-7111)b)." UCC Sections 2-608 and 2A-517 sometimes allow the buyer or lessee to revoke acceptance of nonconforming goods.For instance,Hodess rejected acceptance of nonconforming goods.Hodess was allowed to reject acceptance because it had made a reasonable assumption that the nonconformity would be cured but then the nonconformity was not cured within a reasonable amount of time.

Is Samantha Likely Correct in That She Owes Maddie No