In the text case,Welchert v.American Cyanamid Inc. ,the plaintiffs claimed breach of an express warranty after herbicide manufactured by the defendant allegedly caused crop damage.The issue was whether the Federal Insecticide,Fungicide,and Rodenticide Act preempted claims involving the product's label.What was the result in the case?
A) The court ruled that the state law claim for breach of express warranty was preempted by FIFRA.
B) The court ruled that the portion of the state law claim for breach of express warranty was preempted only to the extent that it sought equitable relief as opposed to money damages.
C) The court ruled that the state law claim for breach of express warranty was not preempted by FIFRA.
D) The court ruled that the state law claim for breach of express warranty was preempted only because it was not filed in a timely manner.
E) The court ruled that the portion of the state law claim for breach of express warranty was preempted only to the extent that it sought money damages as opposed to equitable relief.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: Puffing generally creates an express warranty.
Q12: The purchaser or lessee must have purchased
Q18: Which of the following types of warranties
Q20: A sample or model may provide an
Q21: A salesperson gives the buyer a scale
Q23: Joann makes doll clothing and Jesse makes
Q24: In order for the implied warranty of
Q25: What is one of the two ways
Q26: What was the result in the "Case
Q27: Which of the following is NOT a
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents