What was the result in the "Case Opener" in which a purchaser of a puppy from a person who regularly sold puppies sued the seller for veterinarian bills after the puppy was found to be in poor health?
A) The court found that the puppy was not a good covered under the UCC,and the plaintiff was denied recovery.
B) The court awarded the plaintiff the veterinary bills finding that the UCC applied and that the seller breached the warranty of merchantability.
C) The court refused any recovery to the plaintiff on the basis that the seller was not considered a merchant under the UCC and that no implied warranties were made.
D) The buyer in essence had no remedy because the court ruled that the plaintiff's only remedy,which the plaintiff was unwilling to do,was return of the puppy for a refund.
E) The court allowed the buyer to recover the contract price only,not veterinarian bills.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q21: A salesperson gives the buyer a scale
Q22: In the text case,Welchert v.American Cyanamid Inc.
Q23: Joann makes doll clothing and Jesse makes
Q24: In order for the implied warranty of
Q25: What is one of the two ways
Q27: Which of the following is NOT a
Q28: A[n] _ is any description of the
Q29: Under common law,which warranty is the only
Q30: A salesperson selling a knife tells the
Q31: What was the result in the case
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents