Which of the following best expresses the court's ruling in the case nugget Jackson v.Bumble Bee Seafoods Inc. ,in which the plaintiff sued after small fish bones were found in canned tuna fish eaten by the plaintiff?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

A)Relying on the earlier Blue Ship Tea Room case,the court ruled that the bones
should have been expected in the fish and that there was no warranty of merchantability.
B)Relying on the earlier Blue Ship Tea Room case,the court ruled that the bones should have been expected in the fish and that there was no warranty of merchantability.
C)Relying on the earlier Blue Ship Tea Room case,the court ruled that the bones should have been expected in the fish and that there was no warranty of merchantability.
D)Relying on the earlier Blue Ship Tea Room case,the court ruled that the bones should have been expected in the fish and that there was no warranty of merchantability.

Which of the Following Best Expresses the Court's Ruling in the Case