Is it likely that Ryan will be able to recover damages based upon a breach of the implied warranty of merchantability?
A) No,because of the lack of an implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose.
B) Yes,because Kristin told Ryan that the car would pull the boat.
C) Yes,because Ryan informed Kristin about the need for the car to pull the boat.
D) No,because there was no warranty of merchantability.
E) No,because the implied warranty of merchantability was that the car would,for example,be fit for the ordinary purposes for which such goods are used.Pulling the boat was not an ordinary purpose for that small car.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q66: Which of the following is NOT true
Q67: The primary codification of both state and
Q68: Is the manager correct that the store
Q69: Assuming adoption of the UCC,which of the
Q70: [Boat Tow] Ryan went to a new
Q72: If a written warranty is silent as
Q73: According to the Magnuson-Moss Act,when the seller
Q74: Under the Magnuson-Moss Act,what is the effect
Q75: When was the Magnuson-Moss Act passed?
A)1975
B)1970
C)1955
D)2000
E)1950
Q76: Lexi purchased a new printer for her
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents