Would the school be able to require that Jenna cover the amount of the check based on the law of negotiable instruments?
A)Yes,because she signed on the back with a special qualified endorsement.
B)Yes,because she signed on the back regardless of the type of endorsement.
C)No,because the check was not properly delivered to Brad.
D)Yes,because she signed on the back with a blank unqualified endorsement.
E)No,because she signed on the back using the words,"without recourse."

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

A)The restrictive endorsement "without recourse" means the endorser does not
intend to be bound by this guarantee [UCC 3-415b)].
B)The restrictive endorsement "without recourse" means the endorser does not intend to be bound by this guarantee [UCC 3-415b)].
C)The restrictive endorsement "without recourse" means the endorser does not intend to be bound by this guarantee [UCC 3-415b)].
D)The restrictive endorsement "without recourse" means the endorser does not intend to be bound by this guarantee [UCC 3-415b)].
E)The restrictive endorsement "without recourse" means the endorser does not intend to be bound by this guarantee [UCC 3-415b)].

Would the School Be Able to Require That Jenna Cover