Can Charla be held personally liable for the note?
A) Yes,Charla may be personally liable because Jirah is a holder in due course and was not aware Charla signed on behalf of Prida's.
B) No,agents can never be personally liable even if the principal's name does not appear on the note.
C) No because Jirah was a holder in due course.
D) Yes,agents are personally liable when they sign their own name and omit the name of the principal.
E) No,Jirah is not a holder in due course and Charla will not be held liable if she can show that it was not Prida's intent to hold Charla personally liable.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q61: Under the UCC,when must a check be
Q62: [Run Around] Hema issues a promissory note
Q63: [Diamond Debacle] Prida owns Prida's Jewelry Store.Charla
Q64: Did Dexter dishonor the promissory note?
A)No,Garren only
Q65: Which of the following is true regarding
Q67: Which of the following is true regarding
Q68: [Banking Problems] Celine is a loan officer
Q69: Who is primarily liable for a cashier's
Q70: Which of the following statements is true
Q71: If Garren properly presents the note to
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents