If,instead of endorsing the note to Tonya,Felicia had wanted to demand payment on the note from Branson,could Branson be held liable since he did not sign his name?
A) Yes,the "X" could constitute a signature,but only if Branson also printed his name on the note.
B) No,because the "X" does not constitute a signature because it does not identify the endorser.
C) No,a signature is required to hold a party liable for a negotiable instrument.
D) Yes,because the "X" Branson wrote on the instrument could constitute a signature if Branson used it with the intent to authenticate the instrument.
E) No,public policy would not support holding a party liable for payment if that party did not actually sign the instrument.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q76: Assuming there is proper presentment and notice
Q77: Which of the following is the likely
Q78: [Roommate Troubles] Dexter,Bernard,and Garren were roommates who
Q79: If Charla was not authorized to sign
Q80: Under what circumstances might Charla be held
Q81: Serayah received a check written by Sam
Q82: For a holder to turn to secondarily
Q83: If,instead of demanding payment on the note,Tonya
Q86: Set forth the eight real defenses and
Q87: List the five items that a party
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents