Which of the following was the result on appeal in Merisier v.Bank of America,the case in the text in which the plaintiff sued challenging the bank's determination that based on her involvement,she was not entitled to funds obtained through alleged fraudulent use of her debit card?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

A)In Merisier,the Court of Appeals determined that the plaintiff had advanced no reason to disturb the District Court's findings.According to the appellate court,"that the transactions were authorized is a factual determination that we will reverse only for clear error." A finding is clearly erroneous when although there is evidence to support it,the reviewing court on the entire evidence is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.
Page Ref: 647
B)?In Merisier,the Court of Appeals determined that the plaintiff had advanced no reason to disturb the District Court's findings.According to the appellate court,"that the transactions were authorized is a factual determination that we will reverse only for clear error." A finding is clearly erroneous when although there is evidence to support it,the reviewing court on the entire evidence is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.
C)In Merisier,the Court of Appeals determined that the plaintiff had advanced no reason to disturb the District Court's findings.According to the appellate court,"that the transactions were authorized is a factual determination that we will reverse only for clear error." A finding is clearly erroneous when although there is evidence to support it,the reviewing court on the entire evidence is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.
D)In Merisier,the Court of Appeals determined that the plaintiff had advanced no reason to disturb the District Court's findings.According to the appellate court,"that the transactions were authorized is a factual determination that we will reverse only for clear error." A finding is clearly erroneous when although there is evidence to support it,the reviewing court on the entire evidence is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.
E)In Merisier,the Court of Appeals determined that the plaintiff had advanced no reason to disturb the District Court's findings.According to the appellate court,"that the transactions were authorized is a factual determination that we will reverse only for clear error." A finding is clearly erroneous when although there is evidence to support it,the reviewing court on the entire evidence is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.
Topic: When a Bank May Charge a Customer's Account

Which of the Following Was the Result on Appeal in Merisier