What Did the Court Conclude in the Case Opener,the Case

What did the court conclude in the Case Opener,the case in which the plaintiff claimed that her repossessed vehicle was not sold in a commercially reasonably manner and that she was wrongly left with a deficiency?

A) That while not every aspect of the sale had to be commercially reasonable,the seller failed to show that sufficient advertisement of the sale was accomplished,thereby rendering the sale itself commercially unreasonable.
B) That the secured party failed to prove that its sale of the vehicle conformed with established industry practices.
C) That showing that the sale grossed more than 50% of the vehicle's value established that the sale was commercially reasonable.
D) That there was no obligation on the seller to engage in a commercially reasonable sale because the plaintiff was in default.
E) That good faith in selling the vehicle established commercial reasonableness as a matter of law.