Which of the following was the result in Cameron v.Ewing,the case in the text involving whether monthly proceeds from a reverse mortgage were subject to garnishment?
A) The court ruled that the payments were not subject to garnishment because the payments did not constitute earned income.
B) The court ruled that the payments were not subject to garnishment because the defendant's estate was ultimately liable to repay the monies received to the extent repayment could be generated from sale of the property.
C) The court ruled that the payments were subject to garnishment based on public policy and also that the claimant was entitled to the full amount of the monthly payments.
D) The court ruled that the payments were not subject to garnishment because it would be against public policy to find as such.
E) The court ruled that the payments were subject to garnishment because the payments constituted debts due the defendant.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q42: What is the amount of the homestead
Q43: A judicial order authorizing a local law
Q44: Which of the following is NOT true
Q45: A creditor has what type of lien
Q46: What is the purpose of a creditor
Q48: Which of the following is NOT true
Q49: What if several creditors wish to garnish
Q50: Which of the following is NOT generally
Q51: Matilda did not pay Tomas for services
Q52: A debtor is permitted to retain all
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents