Which of the following represented the position of the Supreme Court of Tennessee in the Case Opener in which the plaintiff attempted to hold a hospital vicariously liable for her injuries?
A) That because the plaintiff dismissed the hospital's alleged agent from the lawsuit,she could not proceed even though she had sued the hospital before dismissing the agent.
B) That the plaintiff could proceed but only because she had already established liability on the part of the physician employees involved.
C) That the plaintiff was barred from proceeding because vicarious liability is not recognized in the medical malpractice arena.
D) That the hospital could be held vicariously liable if the plaintiff established that a wrongful act harming her occurred within the scope of the agent's employment.
E) That a defendant in the position of the hospital is vicariously liable for injuries received within its premises without a need for further proof.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q5: An agency relationship is always terminated by
Q9: Raquel is an agent for Occasion Photography,owned
Q11: As set forth in the text,which of
Q13: A power of attorney is a special
Q14: A principal is not liable for an
Q14: Actual notice of agency termination may not
Q15: Constructive notice that an agency relationship has
Q15: As discussed in the text,which of the
Q16: Agent liability not only applies to how
Q16: In In re Estate of Kurrelmeyer,the case
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents