The text discussed the case of Aguas v.State of New Jersey,where the New Jersey Supreme Court addressed a correctional officer's hostile work environment claim in which she alleged that she had was sexually harassed by her supervisor on several occasions.Which of the following was the result?
A)The case was dismissed because there was an anti-discrimination policy in place,the employer conducted a thorough investigation of the claims,and there was no evidence the alleged harassment derived from the supervisory relationship.
B)The employer was not liable because it had an anti-discrimination policy in place.
C)The employer was liable because it failed to look into applicants' background before hiring.
D)The plaintiff successfully stated her claim for hostile work environment and was granted a $1,000,000 award in damages.
E)The case was dismissed because the employer launched a thorough internal investigation,which revealed no harassment had occurred.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

A)The court dismissed the plaintiff's suit against her employer because the employer had instituted an anti-discrimination policy and engaged in a thorough investigation of the claims,and because there was "no factual evidence showing that the harassment of which plaintiff complains derived from a supervisory relationship."
B)The court dismissed the plaintiff's suit against her employer because the employer had instituted an anti-discrimination policy and engaged in a thorough investigation of the claims,and because there was "no factual evidence showing that the harassment of which plaintiff complains derived from a supervisory relationship."
C)The court dismissed the plaintiff's suit against her employer because the employer had instituted an anti-discrimination policy and engaged in a thorough investigation of the claims,and because there was "no factual evidence showing that the harassment of which plaintiff complains derived from a supervisory relationship."
D)The court dismissed the plaintiff's suit against her employer because the employer had instituted an anti-discrimination policy and engaged in a thorough investigation of the claims,and because there was "no factual evidence showing that the harassment of which plaintiff complains derived from a supervisory relationship."
E)The court dismissed the plaintiff's suit against her employer because the employer had instituted an anti-discrimination policy and engaged in a thorough investigation of the claims,and because there was "no factual evidence showing that the harassment of which plaintiff complains derived from a supervisory relationship."

The Text Discussed the Case of Aguas V