In Mary Kay Inc. ,v.Janet Isbell,the case in the text involving whether the defendant's franchise was wrongfully terminated,what was the result?
A)That under federal law,no franchise existed.
B)That under state law a franchise existed;but that under applicable law,the franchise was not wrongfully terminated.
C)That under federal law a franchise existed;but that under applicable law,the franchise was not wrongfully terminated.
D)That under state law a franchise existed that was wrongfully terminated.
E)That under state law,no franchise existed.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

A)The court ruled that "the business relationship entered into by Isbell and Mary
Kay was not a franchise within the protection of the Arkansas Franchise Practices Act."
B)The court ruled that "the business relationship entered into by Isbell and Mary Kay was not a franchise within the protection of the Arkansas Franchise Practices Act."
C)The court ruled that "the business relationship entered into by Isbell and Mary Kay was not a franchise within the protection of the Arkansas Franchise Practices Act."
D)The court ruled that "the business relationship entered into by Isbell and Mary Kay was not a franchise within the protection of the Arkansas Franchise Practices Act."
E)The court ruled that "the business relationship entered into by Isbell and Mary Kay was not a franchise within the protection of the Arkansas Franchise Practices Act."