Which of the following statements is true regarding the result of the dispute in the Case Opener involving whether a joint venture between law firms was liable for the actions of a partner sanctioned for litigation misconduct?
A) That the law firms were not liable because on the basis of the independent management of the law firms involved,no joint venture actually existed.
B) That a joint venture existed and that members could be held liable for a partner's misconduct while acting in the ordinary course of the joint venture's business.
C) That because a joint venture is defined as a multiple-purpose partnership,the participants could be held liable,but only if the misconduct stemmed from activities engaged in on behalf of the joint venture.
D) That while a joint venture existed,vicarious liability could not be asserted in order to hold members of a joint venture vicariously liable for a partner's misconduct.
E) That because a joint venture is defined as a multiple-purpose LLC,the participants could not be held liable regardless of whether the misconduct stemmed from activities engaged in on behalf of the joint venture.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q37: Which of the following statements represents a
Q38: What is meant by the term "keiretsu,"
Q39: Regarding partnership property rights,which of the following
Q40: Which of the following is true regarding
Q41: [Partnership Problems] Jamar,Kenya,and Tamika want to form
Q43: Which of the following statements is false
Q44: Is Andrew entitled to inspect the books?
A)Yes.
B)Only
Q45: Unless otherwise agreed by the partners,where are
Q46: Did Kenya commit any breach of duty
Q47: The written agreement creating the partnership entered
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents