Which of the following,if any,may be defenses for Isaiah?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

A)A company charged with the first or second violation may claim that the omitted or false statement was immaterial to the sale of the security.Similarly,if the issuer can prove that the plaintiff was aware of the omission or false statement when he bought the security,the defendant can avoid liability.If a defendant sold securities before the effective date of registration,he will almost certainly be liable because the 1933 act provides no defenses for this violation.
B)A company charged with the first or second violation may claim that the omitted or false statement was immaterial to the sale of the security.Similarly,if the issuer can prove that the plaintiff was aware of the omission or false statement when he bought the security,the defendant can avoid liability.If a defendant sold securities before the effective date of registration,he will almost certainly be liable because the 1933 act provides no defenses for this violation.
C)A company charged with the first or second violation may claim that the omitted or false statement was immaterial to the sale of the security.Similarly,if the issuer can prove that the plaintiff was aware of the omission or false statement when he bought the security,the defendant can avoid liability.If a defendant sold securities before the effective date of registration,he will almost certainly be liable because the 1933 act provides no defenses for this violation.
D)A company charged with the first or second violation may claim that the omitted or false statement was immaterial to the sale of the security.Similarly,if the issuer can prove that the plaintiff was aware of the omission or false statement when he bought the security,the defendant can avoid liability.If a defendant sold securities before the effective date of registration,he will almost certainly be liable because the 1933 act provides no defenses for this violation.
E)A company charged with the first or second violation may claim that the omitted or false statement was immaterial to the sale of the security.Similarly,if the issuer can prove that the plaintiff was aware of the omission or false statement when he bought the security,the defendant can avoid liability.If a defendant sold securities before the effective date of registration,he will almost certainly be liable because the 1933 act provides no defenses for this violation.

Which of the Following,if Any,may Be Defenses for Isaiah