What Did the U

What did the U.S.Supreme Court rule in Harris v.Forklift Systems,Inc. ,the case in the text involving Title VII and whether psychological injury is necessary in order for a plaintiff to prevail?

A) That tangible psychological injury is necessary in order to prevail in a sexual harassment case under Title VII.
B) That whether the conduct at issue is physically threatening is the determining factor on the issue of whether psychological damages are available.
C) That whether the victim subjectively perceived the work environment to be abusive and suffered psychological injury is irrelevant to whether a violation of Title VII based on sexual harassment occurred.
D) That courts should apply a precise mathematical test as prescribed in the case in order to determine whether psychological damages are available.
E) That so long as the environment would reasonably be perceived,and is perceived,as hostile or abusive,there is no need for it also to be psychologically injurious.