Is Seth's statement true concerning the need for psychological counseling to prevail on a sexual harassment claim?
A) Yes,a plaintiff is only excused from showing a tangible psychological injury in a claim involving sexual harassment if the plaintiff can prove beyond a reasonable doubt that severe and pervasive harassment frequently occurred.
B) Yes,a plaintiff is required to show a tangible psychological injury in order to prevail on a sexual harassment claim unless the plaintiff can show that the harassment caused the plaintiff monetary harm in the form of lost wages because of inability to work.
C) No,a plaintiff is not required to show a tangible psychological injury in order to prevail on a sexual harassment claim.
D) Yes,a plaintiff is required to show a tangible psychological injury in order to prevail on a sexual harassment claim unless an independent witness can corroborate on an objective basis that sexual harassment actually occurred.
E) Yes,a plaintiff is required to show a tangible psychological injury in order to prevail on any sexual discrimination or sexual harassment claim.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q43: [Hairstyle Headaches] Astrid owned a hair and
Q44: Regarding Roscoe's claim of sexual harassment,which of
Q45: Is Julia entitled to be paid for
Q46: Which of the following statements reflects the
Q47: Will Billy prevail if he contends that
Q49: Under which exemption,if any,may an individual after
Q50: Which of the following statements is false
Q51: Which of the following statements is true
Q52: In the text case Baldwin v.Foxx,where the
Q53: [Pregnancy Peril] Julia,a server at Café Sunshine,found
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents