Which of the following was the result on appeal in Gotlin v.Lederman,the case in the text involving whether the defendants misrepresented the effectiveness of a particular form of cancer treatment,Fractionated Stereotactic Radiosurgery FSR),in violation of New York's consumer protection law?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

A)The court concluded that the district court improperly dismissed the claims because the record presented "genuine issues of material fact as to a)whether defendants' marketing of FSR treatment's 'success rates' was materially deceptive to a reasonable consumer in violation of New York General Business Law,and
b)whether plaintiffs suffered any legally cognizable injuries as a result of defendants' allegedly misleading marketing of FSR treatment."
B)The court concluded that the district court improperly dismissed the claims because the record presented "genuine issues of material fact as to a)whether defendants' marketing of FSR treatment's 'success rates' was materially deceptive to a reasonable consumer in violation of New York General Business Law,and
b)whether plaintiffs suffered any legally cognizable injuries as a result of defendants' allegedly misleading marketing of FSR treatment."
C)The court concluded that the district court improperly dismissed the claims because the record presented "genuine issues of material fact as to a)whether defendants' marketing of FSR treatment's 'success rates' was materially deceptive to a reasonable consumer in violation of New York General Business Law,and
b)whether plaintiffs suffered any legally cognizable injuries as a result of defendants' allegedly misleading marketing of FSR treatment."
D)The court concluded that the district court improperly dismissed the claims because the record presented "genuine issues of material fact as to a)whether defendants' marketing of FSR treatment's 'success rates' was materially deceptive to a reasonable consumer in violation of New York General Business Law,and
b)whether plaintiffs suffered any legally cognizable injuries as a result of defendants' allegedly misleading marketing of FSR treatment."
E)The court concluded that the district court improperly dismissed the claims because the record presented "genuine issues of material fact as to a)whether defendants' marketing of FSR treatment's 'success rates' was materially deceptive to a reasonable consumer in violation of New York General Business Law,and
b)whether plaintiffs suffered any legally cognizable injuries as a result of defendants' allegedly misleading marketing of FSR treatment."

Which of the Following Was the Result on Appeal in Gotlin