In the U.S.Supreme Court case Continental T.V.Inc. ,v.GTE Sylvania Inc. ,Continental argued that Sylvania violated the Sherman Act by restricting the location of retailers that could sell its product.Which of the following was the result?
A) That a per se rule of illegality is applied in a vertical restriction case unless departure from the rule is justified based upon a demonstrable economic effect.
B) The court upheld the continued used of the bright line per se rule of illegality for all vertical restrictions.
C) That the rule-of-reason should always be applied when vertical restrictions are involved.
D) That the per se rule of illegality is applied in a vertical restriction case only when a manufacturing defendant is involved;otherwise,the rule-of-reason test applies.
E) That the rule-of-reason standard should be applied in a vertical restriction case unless departure from the rule is justified based upon a demonstrable economic effect.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q26: Which of the following standards allows a
Q27: Which analysis,if any,is applied to territorial and
Q28: When was the Sherman Act enacted?
A)1925
B)1890
C)1943
D)1935
E)1958
Q29: Chicago School theorists argue that the central,and
Q30: When a company prices one product below
Q32: Congress passed the Sherman Act by what
Q33: When two parties at different levels in
Q34: Which two markets does a court consider
Q35: Which of the following is false regarding
Q36: A seller engages in _ when it
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents