In the "Case Nugget" GNOC Corp.v.Powers,a hotel guest sued a hotel for negligence when valuables were stolen from his hotel room.What was the main holding of the case on appeal?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

A)The appeals court in this case held that under New Jersey law,a hotel could not
be held liable for the loss of valuables that could have been deposited in the hotel safe.Both the cash and the casino chips in this case fell into the category of such valuables.
B)The appeals court in this case held that under New Jersey law,a hotel could not be held liable for the loss of valuables that could have been deposited in the hotel safe.Both the cash and the casino chips in this case fell into the category of such valuables.
C)The appeals court in this case held that under New Jersey law,a hotel could not be held liable for the loss of valuables that could have been deposited in the hotel safe.Both the cash and the casino chips in this case fell into the category of such valuables.
D)The appeals court in this case held that under New Jersey law,a hotel could not be held liable for the loss of valuables that could have been deposited in the hotel safe.Both the cash and the casino chips in this case fell into the category of such valuables.
E)The appeals court in this case held that under New Jersey law,a hotel could not be held liable for the loss of valuables that could have been deposited in the hotel safe.Both the cash and the casino chips in this case fell into the category of such valuables.