Instead of being stolen from the locker,assume that the gym is struck by lightning,and Roxie's cell phone is destroyed in a resulting fire.Who would be liable for the cost of the cell phone in this instance and why?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

A)If property that is subject to a bailment agreement is harmed by an unpreventable "act of God," such as a lightning strike,there is no liability on the part of the bailee under any circumstances.Therefore,Roxie would be liable for the cost of replacing her own phone.
B)If property that is subject to a bailment agreement is harmed by an unpreventable "act of God," such as a lightning strike,there is no liability on the part of the bailee under any circumstances.Therefore,Roxie would be liable for the cost of replacing her own phone.
C)If property that is subject to a bailment agreement is harmed by an unpreventable "act of God," such as a lightning strike,there is no liability on the part of the bailee under any circumstances.Therefore,Roxie would be liable for the cost of replacing her own phone.
D)If property that is subject to a bailment agreement is harmed by an unpreventable "act of God," such as a lightning strike,there is no liability on the part of the bailee under any circumstances.Therefore,Roxie would be liable for the cost of replacing her own phone.
E)If property that is subject to a bailment agreement is harmed by an unpreventable "act of God," such as a lightning strike,there is no liability on the part of the bailee under any circumstances.Therefore,Roxie would be liable for the cost of replacing her own phone.

Instead of Being Stolen from the Locker,assume That the Gym