Which of the following is true regarding whether the insureds in the "Case Opener" were entitled to insurance coverage for imported toxic Chinese drywall used in their home?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

A)The court ruled that the insurance company was within its legal rights to deny the claim.The Virginia Supreme Court concluded that the damage was the result of a latent defect in the drywall.As such,the policy unambiguously excluded from coverage damage caused by the Chinese drywall installed in the house.
B)The court ruled that the insurance company was within its legal rights to deny the claim.The Virginia Supreme Court concluded that the damage was the result of a latent defect in the drywall.As such,the policy unambiguously excluded from coverage damage caused by the Chinese drywall installed in the house.
C)The court ruled that the insurance company was within its legal rights to deny the claim.The Virginia Supreme Court concluded that the damage was the result of a latent defect in the drywall.As such,the policy unambiguously excluded from coverage damage caused by the Chinese drywall installed in the house.
D)The court ruled that the insurance company was within its legal rights to deny the claim.The Virginia Supreme Court concluded that the damage was the result of a latent defect in the drywall.As such,the policy unambiguously excluded from coverage damage caused by the Chinese drywall installed in the house.
E)The court ruled that the insurance company was within its legal rights to deny the claim.The Virginia Supreme Court concluded that the damage was the result of a latent defect in the drywall.As such,the policy unambiguously excluded from coverage damage caused by the Chinese drywall installed in the house.

Which of the Following Is True Regarding Whether the Insureds