What was the effect of Samuel's statement that Keisha should take everything,assuming he was of sound mind?
A) His statement was ineffective to revoke his prior will only because he was angry when he made it.
B) His statement was ineffective to revoke his prior will only because he believed he was dying at the time he made it.
C) His statement would likely be upheld as an oral will because he made the statement during his last illness in front of witnesses who later wrote down his wishes.
D) Because a will is not usually required to be in writing,his statement was effective to revoke any prior will.
E) Because a will must be in writing,his statement has no effect.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q51: The term covers a variety of legal
Q52: Which of the following is a true
Q53: Which of the following is a false
Q54: Which of the following is not a
Q55: What type of trust did Jasmine set
Q57: How many states,if any,have adopted the Uniform
Q58: Signatories to agree to accept wills of
Q59: An)_ trust is created by a court
Q60: Which of the following is a false
Q61: What was the result in the case
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents