Although there is no straightforward, universally accepted method for negotiating disputes between governments and organizations, some strategies do consistently seem to work better than others.Which of the following would experts LEAST likely recommend?
A)Conceive of interest narrowly
B)Change the parties involved in the bargaining
C)Change the existing organizational structure
D)If a memorandum of understanding needs to be prepared, you be the one to do it
E)Use objective criteria

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Experts would least likely recommend conceiving of interest narrowly, as this approach is often seen as limiting potential solutions and hindering the ability to find creative compromises. Rather, a broader focus on mutual interests and goals is generally more effective in negotiating disputes.

Other choices:
B) Changing the parties involved in the bargaining can sometimes break stalemates or create new opportunities for progress. 
C) Changing the existing organizational structure can also be a useful strategy in some cases, such as when bureaucratic obstacles are preventing resolution. 
D) Taking the initiative to prepare a memorandum of understanding can be seen as a proactive and collaborative approach to reaching agreement. 
E) Using objective criteria is a widely recommended tactic for negotiating disputes, as it helps to establish a clear and impartial framework for decision-making.

Although There Is No Straightforward, Universally Accepted Method for Negotiating