Assume an EPA official observes the following situation in a small town on the banks of a river. The town depends heavily on fish for its food and is heavily dependent on coal for its power. A coal factory on the banks of the river empties pollutants into the river causing health problems among the residents and the fish to develop toxic residues in their livers and other organs. Which of the following solutions should the EPA choose to mitigate this negative externality problem (at least in the short run) ?
I. levy taxes on the coal factory's production of pollutants
II. levy taxes on the consumers' consumption of fish
III. create a market for tradable allowances
IV. subsidize firms that produce clean fish
A) I and III only
B) II and IV only
C) III and IV only
D) I, III, and IV only
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q13: Barking dogs cannot be considered an externality
Q20: When a transaction between a buyer and
Q204: Suppose there will be global catastrophe unless
Q205: External costs lead markets to produce a
Q206: Suppose there will be global catastrophe unless
Q208: In a market, the presence of an
Q210: The social cost of antibiotic consumption equals
Q212: The social cost of pollution includes the
Q213: Tradable allowances are _ to Pigouvian taxes
Q214: Markets in which externalities are present are
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents