A politician campaigns on a platform of eliminating welfare benefits. One ad used by politician says: "Receipt of welfare benefits leads to poor school performance: People who receive welfare benefits have, on average, lower grades than people who do not receive welfare benefits." Construct an argument to challenge this causal reasoning. First, give three examples that drive home the point that association does not establish causation. Then, construct a plausible alterative explanation for low grades that does not involve an effect of welfare benefits on grades, but which does allow for their association.
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q39: The common feature of all before-and-after designs
Q40: A procedure that assesses that treatment and
Q41: Which of the following are particularly useful
Q42: Describe the difference between randomization and matching.
Q43: When a researcher matches individual cases with
Q46: Which of the following includes several pretest
Q47: Why aren't context and mechanism as critical
Q48: In what situations is it ethnical to
Q49: While researchers changed the work environment to
Q61: Why aren't experiments very generalizable? What can
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents