ethicists such as Manuel G. Velasquez (2011) argue that whistle-blowing is justified if three conditions are satisfied. One condition is that there is strong evidence that the organization is doing something that is hurting or will hurt other parties. What are the other two conditions?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

According to Manuel G. Velasquez, whistle-blowing is justified if three conditions are satisfied. The first condition is that there is strong evidence that the organization is doing something that is hurting or will hurt other parties. The second condition is that the employee has made a serious but unsuccessful attempt to resolve the problem through internal channels. The third condition is that whistle-blowing is reasonably certain to prevent or stop the wrongdoing. Option C is incorrect because personal harm to the employee is not one of the conditions, and option D is incorrect because the minority group or individuals with disabilities are not specifically mentioned in the conditions set out by Velasquez.

Ethicists Such as Manuel G