In Roth V.United States,the Supreme Court Held That

In Roth v.United States,the Supreme Court held that

A) outdoor drive-ins could not be barred from showing a film that included nudity.
B) the possession of child pornography was not covered by any right to free speech or press,and could be made a crime.
C) the government cannot prohibit discrimination against women priests by churches because it would violate the free exercise of religion.
D) obscenity is not within the area of constitutionally protected free speech.
E) the film Carnal Knowledge,which had critical acclaim but a sexual theme and explicit scenes,could not be banned.