Some critics of defense spending argue that there is a trade-off between guns and butter,and the more money spent on defense,the less there is for social spending.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Critics argue that governments have a limited budget, and increasing spending on defense would mean reducing spending on social programs such as healthcare, education, and welfare. This idea is often referred to as the "guns versus butter" trade-off.

Some Critics of Defense Spending Argue That There Is a Trade-Off