The case of Barton v Armstrong [1969] 2 NSWLR 451, is authority for the principle that:
A) Assault requires a positive intentional act.
B) Threats over the telephone cannot amount to assault as there can be no fear of immediate violence.
C) Threats over the telephone can amount to assault if the fear caused is reasonable.
D) Threats of future violence cannot create a reasonable fear of immediate violence.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: Assault,Battery and false imprisonment are all examples
Q2: Participants in contact sports are taken to
Q2: Which of the following statements is the
Q6: A person who borrows a friend's textbook
Q8: Which of the following statements is the
Q10: Which of the following statements is the
Q11: In which of the following States have
Q11: False imprisonment involves a total restraint of
Q13: A sports club can be held vicariously
Q18: Which of the following statements is the
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents