The case of Morley v Statewide Tobacco Service Ltd (1992) ACLC 1233 is authority for the principle that:
A) A director will not be liable for a breach of s 588G if they were unable to attend company meetings.
B) A director's liability under s 588G is determined by what they ought to have known about the company's debts.
C) A director's liability under s 588G is determined by their actual knowledge of the company's debts.
D) A director will not be liable for a breach of s 588G if they acted in good faith.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q21: What is the term for the stated
Q27: In which of the following circumstances will
Q28: What is meant by the term 'share
Q29: What is a prospectus?
Q30: The decision in ASIC v Gallagher (1993)
Q33: An invitation to members of the public
Q35: In which of the following situations will
Q37: Which of the following is NOT one
Q39: What are the duties of company directors?
Q40: Which of the following is NOT a
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents